home |  electronics |  toolbox |  science club |  tuxtalk |  photos |  e-cards |  online-shop

May 2022

The "follow the science" fraud continues

There are many scientist and over time the research that all those people are doing evolves into some generally accepted theory. This is how we had hundreds of years ago the accepted idea that the earth was the center of the universe and now this theory has evolved into a more complex model. Unlike political science, law, humanities or religion there is no such thing as the "the science". In true science there is no hierarchy of authority. Hopefully the professor knows more than the student but it does not have to be like this. The truth will eventually prevail and this is how science evolves.

You can buy scientists or simply find some that happen to say what you would like to hear. Big cooperations have been doing that for a long time. The tobacco industry, herbicide companies and pharma have been using that trick successfully for marketing. It's nothing new. You use your advertisement budget to publish the results that you would like to hear.

What is new is the scale at which this now happening. A simulation study, that is a model based on some assumptions, has made it somehow into the news. It's everywhere and it's completely wrong but journalists still write about it. What is happening here?

Those who did this study have been putting people into categories: vaccinated and unvaccinated. They could have chosen any category, old people vs young, etc ... They came up with this:

When you do a modelling study then the results depend entirely on the quality of the model and the assumptions. You can claim anything if you just use the wrong data and make wrong assumptions. This is what has happened here and Prof David Fisman from Toronto published it in cmaj.ca ( Note: Pfizer and cmaj.ca had formed in 2009 a partnership to "educate" Canadian physicians ).

How do we know it's wrong? Well, we just look at the reality, actual data. Here is a recent dataset from the walgreens pharmacies in the US. They published their covid test results a few days ago and they use the same categories that this modeling study used. You can clearly see that the vaccinated category is more likely to be infected (and thus more likely to spread the disease):

source: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

So real world data shows exactly the opposite of what the modelling study by Prof David Fisman from Toronto suggest! The David Fisman study is complete fiction and you find it in every Canadian newspaper. It's not surprising that a professor writes something that is wrong but it is very surprising that such a document gets then promoted by many journalists. In the past you could distinguish advertisement in your local paper clearly from news and reports. This is a case were somebody is paying multiple media organizations to disguise advertisement as journalism and on top of this it's false. The opposite is true. This is orchestrated fraud.

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

Dr. Byram W. Bridle analyzed the fraudulent David Fisman model in more detail. Have a look: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/fiction-disguised-as-science-to-promote

They are not afraid of you seeing disinformation. They are afraid of you seeing the truth.

The whole fraud started because various government institutions became captured by pharma companies (just like medical journals and professors are captured). The goal is to sell "the cure" and nobody needs to ensure that it actually works. Because of the Emergency Use Authorization they don't care what the product does. They can claim anything just to sell it. Thanks to the Pfizer documents released under FOIA we do know that the following statements were already known to be false, long before Fauci, Walensky and Biden made those statements. Like Fisman, they know that they are at best misleading the public:

Yes, $cience!

Should doctors, politicians, public health officials and researchers wear uniforms that identify their sponsors?

Doctors with uniforms that identify their sponsors.

Update: Jan 2024, a book about the fraud Prof Fisman is out

Scientific fraud has been a important component in the covid crimes against humanity. The government and government paid judges are not investigating the crimes yet but public awareness is growing and a new book just came out to increase awareness further.

[Fisman s Fraud Book by Dr Regina Watteel]
Fisman's Fraud Book by Dr Regina Watteel

Back to: "No preservatives added"

© 2004-2024 Guido Socher